How to File a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court: Complete Step-by-Step Procedure
Related Practice Area:Special Leave Petitions — Civil (SLP Civil)A step-by-step guide to filing a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court of India under Article 136: limitation, certified copies, drafting the petition, filing through an Advocate-on-Record, curing defects, and the first hearing.
90 days from the date of the judgment or order (60 days from the date on which the High Court refused a certificate of fitness). Time taken to obtain the certified copy is excluded. A late petition needs an application for condonation of delay.
- •Constitution of India — Article 136 (special leave to appeal)
- •Supreme Court Rules, 2013 — Order XXI (special leave petitions in civil proceedings) and Order XXII (special leave petitions in criminal proceedings)
- •Supreme Court Rules, 2013 — Order IV (Advocates-on-Record) and the provisions on presentation, scrutiny and curing of defects
- •Limitation Act, 1963 — Article 133, Section 5 (condonation of delay) and Section 12 (exclusion of time for obtaining copies)
Step-by-Step Procedural Roadmap
Decide Whether a Special Leave Petition Is the Right Remedy
A special leave petition asks the Supreme Court for permission to appeal; it is not an appeal as of right. Before drafting, confirm that no other remedy is more suitable, that the order is one the Court is likely to examine, and that the petition is within time.
- If a statute provides a direct appeal to the Supreme Court (for example from the NCLAT or the NGT), file that appeal instead of a special leave petition.
- If the order is interlocutory and the main case is still pending below, consider whether the Court is likely to intervene now or leave the point to be raised later.
- Where the High Court has made an error apparent on the face of the record, consider whether a review in the High Court should be the first step.
- Identify the question of law, or the specific perversity in the findings, that makes the case one for the Supreme Court.
- Compute limitation: 90 days from the order, excluding the time taken to obtain the certified copy.
Collect the Certified Copy and the Record
The petition must be accompanied by a certified copy of the impugned judgment, and the annexures must be copies of documents that were part of the record before the court or tribunal below.
- Apply for the certified copy of the impugned judgment as soon as it is pronounced; if it is not ready, file an application for exemption from filing it and produce it later.
- Collect the pleadings, the orders of the courts below and the evidence that the petition will rely on.
- Arrange English translations of documents in other languages, with an application for exemption from filing official translations where needed.
- If a document was not part of the record below, it can be filed only with an application seeking permission and explaining why it is necessary.
Draft the Petition and Its Applications
The paper-book follows a prescribed sequence. The parts the Bench reads first, the synopsis, the list of dates and the questions of law, deserve the most care.
- Synopsis and list of dates: a short account of the dispute and the decisions below, with page references to the paper-book.
- Questions of law: few, precise and genuinely arising from the impugned judgment.
- Grounds: confined to the pleadings before the court below; additional grounds can be urged only with the Court's leave.
- A statement whether any other petition has been filed against the same order, and full disclosure of earlier rounds of litigation and any undertakings given.
- Prayer for special leave, an application for interim relief (stay, status quo or bail), and the petitioner's affidavit.
- Where applicable, applications for condonation of delay, exemption from filing the certified copy, and permission to file additional documents.
In Criminal Cases, Deal with Surrender
Under Order XXII, a petition against a sentence of imprisonment must state whether the petitioner has surrendered and must be accompanied by proof of surrender. A petitioner who has not surrendered must file an application seeking exemption from surrendering, which the Court decides on its merits.
- Obtain a certificate from the jail authorities showing custody and the period undergone.
- If seeking exemption from surrendering, explain the circumstances, for instance a short sentence, the period already undergone, age or health.
- Annex the relevant parts of the trial record, such as the FIR, charge sheet, depositions and exhibits relied on.
File through an Advocate-on-Record and Cure Defects
Only an Advocate-on-Record can file a petition on behalf of a party. Filing is done on the Supreme Court's e-filing portal, after which the Registry scrutinises the papers and communicates any defects.
- Execute a vakalatnama in favour of the Advocate-on-Record.
- File the petition with the court fee; a diary number is generated on filing.
- Cure defects promptly. The Rules allow limited time to remove defects, and the Registrar may decline to register a petition whose defects are not cured; an order of the Registrar can be challenged before the Judge in Chambers.
- Once the defects are cleared, the petition is registered and given a case number.
Caveats, Service and Listing
If the respondent has lodged a caveat in the Supreme Court, the petition must be served on the caveator, and the Court will ordinarily not pass an ex parte order without hearing the caveator.
- Check whether a caveat has been lodged, and serve the caveator with a copy of the petition and applications.
- Fresh matters are listed in the ordinary course after registration.
- For genuine urgency, such as imminent dispossession, demolition or arrest, seek urgent listing through the Registry's mentioning procedure, stating the reasons.
The First Hearing and What Follows
At the first hearing, the Bench may dismiss the petition, issue notice to the respondents (sometimes limited to a particular question), grant interim relief, or grant leave straight away.
- If notice is issued, arrange service on the respondents and track their appearance.
- The respondents may file a counter affidavit, and the petitioner a rejoinder, within the time allowed.
- If leave is granted, the petition is converted into a civil or criminal appeal and proceeds to a final hearing.
- Comply with any condition attached to interim relief, such as a deposit, within the time fixed, or the relief may lapse.
What the Bench Looks for at the First Hearing
Most special leave petitions are decided at the first hearing, often within a few minutes. The Bench has usually read the synopsis, the list of dates, the questions of law and the impugned judgment. The petition has to persuade it, quickly, that the case raises a question of law of some importance, or that the judgment below involves an error so serious that it results in injustice.
The essay on civil special leave petitions discusses the kinds of case in which leave is ordinarily granted, and the essay on criminal special leave petitions covers the criminal side. In both, a petition that simply reargues the facts, or lists every conceivable error without identifying the one that matters, is unlikely to succeed.
Framing the Questions of Law
A well-framed question of law is short, arises from the reasoning of the impugned judgment, and can be answered without first resolving a disputed fact. It should identify the provision or principle in issue and the respect in which the High Court is said to have erred, for instance by applying the wrong test, ignoring a binding decision, or reading a statutory provision in a way that conflicts with the decisions of other High Courts.
Compound questions, questions that assume the petitioner's version of disputed facts, and long lists of overlapping questions weaken a petition. Where the case turns on a conflict between High Courts or with a decision of the Supreme Court, the petition should cite the conflicting decisions precisely, since that is often the strongest reason for the Court to intervene.
Dismissal at the Threshold and the Review Option
An order dismissing a special leave petition at the threshold does not merge the High Court's judgment into the Supreme Court's order. As the Court held in Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala, and reaffirmed in Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd., a party whose petition has been dismissed in limine may still apply to the High Court for review of its judgment on the grounds available in law. A non-speaking order of dismissal declares no law under Article 141.
If a petition is to be withdrawn, the terms of the order matter. A petition withdrawn without liberty is generally treated as closing the door to a second petition against the same order, so if the petitioner wishes to seek review in the High Court or pursue another remedy, liberty to do so should be sought expressly.
Common Reasons for Dismissal
Petitions most often fail because they invite the Court to reappreciate evidence on which the courts below have recorded concurrent findings, without showing that the findings are perverse. Others fail because they raise grounds that were never urged below, or depend on documents that were not part of the record.
Suppression of material facts is treated seriously. A petition that does not disclose an earlier round of litigation, an undertaking given to the court below, or a related order may be dismissed on that ground alone, whatever its merits. Delay that is not properly explained is another common reason; the guide to limitation and condonation of delay explains how the Court approaches it.
Interim relief is frequently granted on conditions. In money matters, a stay of execution is often conditional on depositing all or part of the decretal amount or furnishing security, and failure to comply with the condition in time usually means losing the protection.
After Leave Is Granted
Once leave is granted, the special leave petition becomes a civil or criminal appeal. The Court is then exercising appellate jurisdiction in the full sense, within the questions on which leave was granted, and the appeal awaits its turn for final hearing. Interim orders made at the stage of the petition usually continue unless modified.
Many matters, however, are disposed of without a full appeal: after notice, the Court may set aside the impugned judgment and remit the case for fresh consideration, record a settlement, or dismiss the petition after hearing both sides. Parties should be prepared for a final decision at any listing after notice has been issued.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the limitation period for an SLP in the Supreme Court?
Ninety days from the date of the judgment or order, or sixty days from the date on which the High Court refused a certificate of fitness to appeal. The time taken to obtain a certified copy of the order is excluded. A petition filed later must be accompanied by an application for condonation of delay explaining the delay.
Can I file an SLP against an interim order of the High Court?
Yes, Article 136 extends to any order. But the Court is often reluctant to interfere while the main case is pending below, unless the order decides a question of jurisdiction or causes harm that cannot be undone later.
Who can file a special leave petition?
Any party aggrieved by the judgment, and in some cases a person who was not a party but is adversely affected by it, with the permission of the Court. On behalf of a party, the petition must be filed through an Advocate-on-Record.
Can new grounds or documents be raised in the Supreme Court?
Ordinarily no. The grounds are confined to the pleadings below, and annexures must have been part of the record. Additional grounds, especially pure questions of law arising on admitted facts, and additional documents may be permitted only with the Court's leave.
What happens if my SLP is dismissed?
A review petition may be filed in the Supreme Court within thirty days, on the limited grounds available for review. Because a threshold dismissal does not merge the High Court's judgment into the Supreme Court's order, a review in the High Court may also remain open in an appropriate case.
Authorities Cited
Full texts open on Indian Kanoon in a new tab.
- Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd., (2019) 4 SCC 376Case brief →Full text of Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd. on Indian Kanoon
- Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala, (2000) 6 SCC 359Case brief →Full text of Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala on Indian Kanoon